|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to Saab92x.com!
|
|
|
|
If you read all of the articles on their "upgrade," you'll notice they actually messed-up the car's specs to some degree.
1st, they INCREASED stopping distance with a brake "upgrade."
2nd, they admittedly made the car sound "like a ricer," by adding the headers.
Also, with all of th eeffort put forth, they only managed .04g better than stock cornering.
A good set of rims and tires should have had that effect.
///M
Offline
Offline
Azrael wrote:
iota wrote:
this is the oldest thread on the board
...that hasn't been deleted. There must have been three before this. Resurrect those and show us what's up.
Ya, what he said 
Offline
they were the unauthorized pics of topher's mom before Iota had the true vision of what the site was going to be about. 
Offline
So no more of Dan92x's rantings? Its a sad day. 
Just checked. His last post was 2-10-06.
Last edited by Hoagie (2006-11-14 19:31:34)
Offline
john_matrix wrote:
they were the unauthorized pics of topher's mom before Iota had the true vision of what the site was going to be about.
Those were good pictures!
Offline
OLDEST THREAD ON SAAB92x.COM !!!!!!!!!!!! 
Revival of the oldest ! 
Offline
Offline
Double not funny.
Offline
AbACUZ wrote:
bump !
Offline
Off topic bump:
Saab – Gone
One GM brand has had even lower market share than Hummer, and that's Saab. And now it finds itself in the same position - under "strategic review." If no buyer is found, Sweden-based Saab will likely fade away.
Even including Europe, Saab sales are small for a parent company the size of GM. Its best year worldwide was 2006 when about 130,000 sold in the U.S. and Europe, a Saab spokesman said. By contrast, GM sold more than 300,000 Buicks in the U.S. alone that year.
Though where does our affinity lie, in Saab or in Subaru?
Offline
I don't feel much for Saab. They don't make a single product I'd want to own. My 9-2X is 98% Subaru anyway.
Offline
jurni wrote:
Though where does our affinity lie, in Saab or in Subaru?
Subaru, no question. That's the main reason why I bought the car. I've wanted a WRX since they came out in '02, but I wasn't a big fan of the exterior styling. I have always liked the exterior styling of Saabs, but I didn't like the drivetrain, or reliability for that matter. For me, it's the best of both worlds.
Offline
acurry420 wrote:
jurni wrote:
Though where does our affinity lie, in Saab or in Subaru?
Subaru, no question. That's the main reason why I bought the car. I've wanted a WRX since they came out in '02, but I wasn't a big fan of the exterior styling. I have always liked the exterior styling of Saabs, but I didn't like the drivetrain, or reliability for that matter. For me, it's the best of both worlds.
Same for me. But I wish some of Saab's interior cues and quality carried over to our cars.
Offline
At the GM dealer, the saab accessory case was pretty sad: 2-3 pens, a 92x hat, a 93x hat, and some valve stem caps. Hummer though had pens, hats, cologne, body wash, t-shirts, jackets, button up shirts, models, etc. etc. etc.
jurni wrote:
Off topic bump:
Saab – Gone
One GM brand has had even lower market share than Hummer, and that's Saab. And now it finds itself in the same position - under "strategic review." If no buyer is found, Sweden-based Saab will likely fade away.
Even including Europe, Saab sales are small for a parent company the size of GM. Its best year worldwide was 2006 when about 130,000 sold in the U.S. and Europe, a Saab spokesman said. By contrast, GM sold more than 300,000 Buicks in the U.S. alone that year.
Though where does our affinity lie, in Saab or in Subaru?
Offline
I just feel I need to post on this... being as it is the first one.
Offline
Offline
|
|
|
