![]() |
|
|
Welcome to Saab92x.com!
|
|
|
Mods? Search the forum you n00b
Offline
Offline
Did you buy it as a set or piece it together? Bet it all fit really nice.
Offline
Here is my road dyno interpolated using wheel diameter and weight.
This is to the wheels:
Offline
I cleaned the thread up a bit. Please keep this to just dyno related things please PM the person or start a new thread if you have questions.
Thanks!
Chris
Offline
Sorry for the crappy pic. The numbers that are covered are the averages. The middle column is max. Mods are: Cobb AP, Stromung Shorty DP, STI Uppipe, STI axle back, Cobb Pulley, Prodrive IC hose. This dyno result is on a Cobb stage 2 91 v130 base map. The Protune with Christian did not result in more power so we went back to the stock map- these are the results.
Last edited by obraystyle (2007-05-24 13:25:44)
Offline
2005 Aero
VF39
07 WRX injectors
Walboro Fuel pump
STi TMIC
Cobb AP V2
GM Boost Solenoid
Vishnu Uppipe
TurboXS Stealthback (catted)
Prodrive Axleback
Offline
Dyno Dynamics "heartbreaker" is no joke.. Looks like it's time to pitch the stock exhaust..
Also, looking at it, my boost response isn't what it has been.. Could just be the heat, but I tend to doubt it..
For History sake mods were:
EJ205,VF34,Blues,BKR7ES,Invidia UP,Generic Down,Stock CBE,Generic TMIC,Custom I/C Sprayers, Walbro
Last edited by evengrift (2008-07-18 01:45:56)
Offline
2006 aero 5mt
STI VF39 turbo (2004?)
STI TMIC (2004?)
Invidia catless downpipe
SPT catback exhaust
Walbro fuel pump
Custom tune w/stock ECU on mustang dyno
Everything else stock
Before (stock w/SPT catback) and after (all mod's above)
Last edited by Bucky (2008-08-31 13:49:52)
Offline
I dont have a scanner right now so I hope this pic works
2005 Aero 4EAT
STI Uppipe
Cobb Catted DP
STI Cat Back Exhaust
Elevation-5400 feet
91 octane
Tuned by Harvey aka The Boost Creep at Super Repair in Boulder, CO
191.3whp/200wtq
Last edited by Dutchman (2009-01-10 16:53:20)
Offline
Does the autotragic suffer more drivetrain losses than the 5spd? I pulled 199hp/200tq running a Cobb OTS map. The only difference in our set up is my Cobb Uppipe.
Offline
S2K-F8 wrote:
Does the autotragic suffer more drivetrain losses than the 5spd? I pulled 199hp/200tq running a Cobb OTS map. The only difference in our set up is my Cobb Uppipe.
Yes, it does, a lot more.
Offline
And to compare with Dutchman's dyno, we are almost running the same setup:
COBB Accessport v1 Engine Management
COBB catted downpipe
Prodrive 3-Port Boost Solenoid
STi uppipe
STi axleback+ midpipe
Rallitek 4eat Tranny mount
93 octane fuel
Tuned by Jorge at P&L Motorsports, December 2007, and I'm loving every minute of it.
216.73 whp / 211.80 wtq
It was one of my favorite mods to be honest, not only is the power more linear and smoother, I know all my mods are running safely.
Offline
The altitude and fuel difference, and Dyno Dynamics Dyno make that look about right. What's your peak boost Dutch? Does the car feel smoother?
Offline
amorican wrote:
The altitude and fuel difference, and Dyno Dynamics Dyno make that look about right. What's your peak boost Dutch? Does the car feel smoother?
Peak boost is like 15.5 I believe. The car feels A LOT smoother! Harvey said the Cobb OTS map was not so bad but his tune is a lot safer and I got some pretty decent power gains out of it. When Harvey would let the car sit for a little while and cool down I was hitting 200whp/210wtq.
Scott-What kind of dyno was that on? If it was a Dynojet then I'm thinking that's why. From what I've read (and that's been a lot as of late) Dynojets read quite a bit higher. I talked to Harvey a little to about that and he tried to play it off but in not so many words he said the same thing.
Offline
Will start a new thread in Rocky mountain, my bad.
Mods, clean this post up. Sorry, I should of used my reading skills!
Last edited by amorican (2009-01-11 03:48:59)
Offline
E85
FP Small 16g
DW 750cc Injectors
STI TMIC
Cobb Catted DP
STI CBE
Gimmick Inlet
Cobb MAF Hose
Walbro
Prodrive BCS
Running 16.3lbs
Elevation: 5400ft
1.15 Dyno CF
Last edited by Dutchman (2009-03-15 12:00:38)
Offline
Dude, 485 WTQ!
Offline
ska 92x wrote:
Dude, 485 WTQ!
+1 FUGGIN CRAZY!!!
Hope that job is paying enough for many sets of new rubber... you is gonna need it!!!
Offline
Holy fuck balls, that's a lotta torque.
Offline
ska 92x wrote:
Dude, 485 WTQ!
I hope you have a kill switch for all that torque aggie.
Offline
eurospek wrote:
ska 92x wrote:
Dude, 485 WTQ!
I hope you have a kill switch for all that torque aggie.
Should be right around 2nd gear.
Offline
aggie113 wrote:
Might as well throw mine up here as well:
E85 of course. Was hoping for higher HP numbers but I guess torque is what counts more.
Do you have any indication if or where the converter locks up on that run? I can see the higher stall generating those huge whltq numbers, but I guess what I'm getting at is that if you're not locked up later in the trace, you could be losing (not seeing) your horsepower numbers - that is,
Was hoping for higher HP numbers
Your HP numbers listed may on the low side, losing some efficiency through slip in the converter, while your engine is making more. Just thinking out loud...
Offline
2005 Aero
2.2L stroker
AEM cold air intake
STi intercooler
STi uppipe
Bosal shorty downpipe
91 oct, 95˚F in the shade
Engine and tune by Kevin @ Garage Tuning
220 hp / 240 tq
I was hoping for a little more, but that's all he could get out of the stock TD04.
Offline
Not to criticize, but that is a choppy curve it looks like. He should be able to squeeze a little more out, but also be able to smooth that curve out a bit. It also looks like it is not holding boost into the upper RPMs, causing the sharper downward angle of the torque curve, should be flatter... just my thinkings. Good luck though.
Offline
|